The Nike Air Max 2017, a model that landed squarely in the middle of the Air Max lineage, generated a wave of both positive and negative feedback. While many lauded its comfort and stylish design, others found its durability and responsiveness lacking. This in-depth review delves into various aspects of the Nike Air Max 2017, drawing from user experiences and professional assessments to provide a comprehensive understanding of this popular sneaker. We'll examine the shoe's cushioning, breathability, versatility, durability, responsiveness, and overall value, aiming to offer a balanced perspective that helps potential buyers make an informed decision.
Nike Air Max 2017: A Closer Look
The Air Max 2017 represented Nike's continued evolution of its iconic Air Max technology. It built upon the successes of previous models, incorporating a full-length Max Air unit for exceptional cushioning, a breathable engineered mesh upper for comfort, and a sleek, modern design that appealed to a wide range of consumers. However, unlike some predecessors, the Air Max 2017 opted for a less aggressive, more understated aesthetic, prioritizing comfort and everyday wearability over bold, futuristic styling. This design choice contributed to its broad appeal but also attracted criticism from those seeking a more visually striking sneaker.
Air Max 2017: Cushioning and Comfort – The Strengths
One area where the Air Max 2017 consistently shines is cushioning. The full-length Max Air unit provides exceptional impact protection, making it a comfortable choice for all-day wear. Many users reported experiencing significantly reduced foot fatigue, even after prolonged periods of standing or walking. This cushioning proved particularly beneficial for those with foot problems or those who spend a lot of time on their feet. The soft, plush midsole further enhanced the overall comfort, creating a feeling of walking on clouds, a common sentiment expressed in numerous Air Max 2017 reviews. The combination of the Air unit and the midsole makes it a great option for casual wear, light exercise, and even some light jogging.
Air Max 2017 Reviews: A Mixed Bag
Online reviews paint a picture of a sneaker with both significant strengths and noticeable weaknesses. While many praise the Air Max 2017 for its unparalleled comfort and stylish design, a recurring theme revolves around durability concerns. Several users reported premature wear and tear, particularly in the outsole and upper. The engineered mesh, while breathable, appeared to be susceptible to tearing or abrasion with heavy use. The outsole, while providing decent traction, seemed to wear down faster than expected for some users, especially those who frequently wore them in demanding environments. This inconsistency in reported durability suggests that the shoe's lifespan might vary considerably depending on individual usage patterns and environmental conditions.
Nike Air Max Upper Review: Breathability and Fit
The Nike Air Max 2017's upper, primarily constructed from engineered mesh, is designed for breathability. This feature is crucial for maintaining comfort, especially during warmer weather or during physical activity. Many reviewers appreciated the airy feel of the upper, noting that their feet remained cool and well-ventilated. However, the mesh's delicate nature contributed to the durability concerns mentioned earlier. The fit itself is generally described as comfortable and true to size, although some users reported a slightly snug fit in the toe box. This could be attributed to individual foot shapes and preferences, highlighting the importance of trying the shoe on before purchasing if possible. The overall fit is generally considered to be secure and supportive, preventing excessive slippage during movement.
current url：https://fpbmkq.h824a.com/global/nike-air-max-2017-ervaringen-98129